Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0358920070340010062
Journal of the Korean Academy of Pedodontics
2007 Volume.34 No. 1 p.62 ~ p.72
Lee Hyeon-Heon

Jang Chul-Ho
Kim Young-Jae
Kim Jung-Wook
Jang Ki-Taeg
Abstract
The purpose of present study was to determine whether different kinds of curing lights can alter microtensile bond strength(MTBS) of class I cavity pulpal and axial wall specimens in primary molar.

Thirty clean mandibular 2nd primary molar¡¯s occlusal enamel were removed and class I cavity, size of 2¡¿4¡¿2 mm was prepared. Dentin bonding agent was applied according to manufacturer¡¯ s manual. Each group was cured with Halogen Curing Unit, Plasma Curing Unit and LED Curing Unit. Composite resin was bulk filled and photo cured with same curing unit. MTBS specimens which size is 0.7¡¿0.7¡¿4 mm were prepared with low speed saw. Specimens were coded by their curing lights and wall positions (Halogen - Axial wall group, Halogen - Pulpal wall group, Plasma - Axial wall group, Plasma - Pulpal wall group, LED - Axial wall group, LED - Pulpal wall group). MTBS were tested at 1 mm/min cross Head speed by Universal Testing Machine. Fractured surface and bonding surface was observed with SEM. T-test between axial and pulpal specimens in each curing lights, one-way ANOVA among different curing light specimens in each wall positions were done. Weibull distribution analysis was done.

The results were as follows: Mean MTBS of pulpal wall specimens were significantly greater than that of axial wall specimens at each curing units(p<.05). There was no significant difference in the MTBS among three curing units at axial wall and pulpal wall. In Weibull distribution, pulpal wall specimens were more homogeneous than axial wall specimens.
KEYWORD
microtensile bond strength, C-factor, weibull ºÐÆ÷ºÐ¼®, primary molar, class I cavity, light curing unit, weibull distribution analysis
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)